To The Editor:
The question of whether to renovate the Marion Town House at great expense (north of $12 million is great expense, in my opinion) or to build a much less expensive modern facility to house some municipal services is in the hands of the Marion selectmen and the Town House Building Committee. I don’t believe that posterity – meaning the families of our children – will approve of us valuing historic preservation above the needs of them and their children.
Elizabeth Taber gave the building that was her Tabor Academy to the town, as a gift. She had built a beautiful building, because she believed that education was worth it. However, when that building no longer met the Academy’s needs, it was, to her, just surplus, something to be handed along. I can’t imagine that she would be happy if we – her posterity – proved we did not learn from her example, that we did not focus on the functions of government and diverted our tax money to preserve what she had declared surplus.
I join with the many other Marion citizens in urging that the renovation of the Town House be put on a back burner, and the THBC develop a plan for a new administrative center and facilities, located on the VFW property. Furthermore, on behalf of that posterity I was talking about, I ask that the THBC charge the planners, architects, and engineers of the new building(s) to make provision for the advanced technologies that, in the near future, will bring greater efficiencies and economies to town services. Historic preservation is a wonderful thing, but it’s an unaffordable luxury until we can be sure that the basics are covered.
Edmund P. O’Connell, Marion
The views expressed in the “Letters to the Editor” column are not necessarily those of The Wanderer, its staff or advertisers. The Wanderer will gladly accept any and all correspondence relating to timely and pertinent issues in the great Marion, Mattapoisett and Rochester area, provided they include the author’s name, address and phone number for verification. We cannot publish anonymous, unsigned or unconfirmed submissions. The Wanderer reserves the right to edit, condense and otherwise alter submissions for purposes of clarity and/or spacing considerations. The Wanderer may choose to not run letters that thank businesses, and The Wanderer has the right to edit letters to omit business names. The Wanderer also reserves the right to deny publication of any submitted correspondence.