During the 14 December 2022 District School Committee meeting, Joseph Pires an elected representative of the Old Rochester School District made comments during the Equity Subcommittee report proposing that hate speech directed at members of his community be elevated to public discourse and considered when shaping district policy. This is appalling. The argument that all voices need to be heard no matter how bigoted, homophobic, outlandish, and lacking in factual basis must be listened to is extremely damaging. Our expectation from our elected officials is that hate speech is to be condemned at every opportunity, full stop. Mr. Pires presented a thinly veiled rationale built on bigotry and racism to undermine the year’s long hard-fought efforts made by this community to ensure that school administrators and educators engage in long overdue diversity, equity, and inclusion work in the Old Rochester Regional School District.
When marginalized members of the community who have tirelessly advocated to bring to our collective attention the need to be provided with basic human dignity in our school community, calling them out for a lack of inclusion and equity is a cruel distortion of thought.
Using one’s status as a “minority” to present a singular representative experience of marginalized groups in the Tri-Town, that also grants absolute authority and expertise to represent every concern of members of a protected class is preposterous. These groups are not a monolith. It also should be noted that folks who use parts of their identity as a shield against criticisms or weapons to attack others, particularly when they are trying to speak or be heard does not make you a champion for Equity.
Equity is the processes of ensuring that practices and programs are impartial, fair and provide equal possible outcomes for every individual. Inclusion is the practice of ensuring that members of the community feel comfortable showing up at as their authentic and best self. Diversity is the presence of differences within a given setting. In this community, that can mean differences in race, religion, ethnicity, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age and socioeconomic class. It can also refer to differences in physical ability, veteran status, whether or not you have children — all of those are components of diversity.
From debates implying that speaking about racism breeds more racism, to claiming that students are afraid to use restrooms due to the risk of being attacked by trans students, those on the fringes of public debate are forcing their opinions to be validated. In doing so they are polarizing the conversation and preventing any real progress of compromise from being made. If we must listen to everyone, and acknowledge the validity of their opinions, then taking any sort of action that might disagree with them becomes impossible. Especially when these people present themselves as the victim at the slightest pushback.
Of course, everyone is entitled to have his or her own thoughts and opinions, even irrational ones, but if we want to have real, meaningful discussions about important issues that move toward some sort of truth, we need to condemn hate speech and remove from the discourse those who do not contribute to the discussion with facts and logical arguments.
The Kearns Family
Frances-Feliz and Thomas Kearns, Mattapoisett
The views expressed in the “Letters to the Editor” column are not necessarily those of The Wanderer, its staff or advertisers. The Wanderer will gladly accept any and all correspondence relating to timely and pertinent issues in the great Marion, Mattapoisett and Rochester area, provided they include the author’s name, address and phone number for verification. We cannot publish anonymous, unsigned or unconfirmed submissions. The Wanderer reserves the right to edit, condense and otherwise alter submissions for purposes of clarity and/or spacing considerations. The Wanderer may choose to not run letters that thank businesses, and The Wanderer has the right to edit letters to omit business names. The Wanderer also reserves the right to deny publication of any submitted correspondence.