Rochester’s Planning Board Tuesday reviewed updated plans for the Special Permit and Site Plan Review application for a commercial building at 621 County Road that will include Megan’s Organic Market, a recreational-marijuana retail store and fielded concerns raised by the business’s nearest abutter.

            Louise Hebert of 617 County Road asked when will the lit signage go on and be turned off and what will be the hours of operation.

            The petitioner’s attorney, Jonathan Silverman, answered that all the parking-lot lighting will be cast downward and will turn off an hour after closing time to allow employees to safely leave work. The proposed hours of operation, he said, are from 8:00 am to 10:00 pm.

            Hebert grimaced in response.  She noted that means the lights next door to her home will be lit until 11:00 pm, and she gets up at 4:00 am for work.

            Planning Board Chairman Arnold Johnson offered the consolation that the panel reserves the right to revisit anything that becomes a nuisance issue that arises at a business it permits.

            Silverman noted cannabis-retail shops are heavily regulated, more so than other similar retail businesses, and therefore they create less nuisance problems because of their mandated restriction such as against on-site loitering.

            “It is inevitable that this is happening,” Hebert admitted. “I just want you to be a good neighbor.”

            Planning Board member Lee Carr asked if the store name could be changed to make Megan’s Organic Market less misleading. People could visit the store assuming it’s a place where they can buy tomatoes, he said.

            Other board members added their own recommendations that a reference to cannabis sales be added to signage. Silverman said other communities have been against seeing “cannabis” on store signs but that his client would “love” to comply by adding the reference to signage in Rochester.

            The public hearing began with Phil Cordeiro of Allen and Major Associates, Inc., updating the board on the project’s design plan.

            Megan’s Organic Market will be within a 7,500 square-foot building. Its part of the lot will offer 42 parking spaces. For the two abutting residents to the south, there will be a vegetated border that includes leaving in existing trees. North-side abutters will get a 20-foot vegetated buffer and fence.

            Water will be provided through the extension of a Town of Wareham municipal water line. Fire suppression will be augmented by a dedicated fire hydrant on site.

            Johnson said the board wants to see the security plan for the facility before voting on the draft decision. Silverman said this plan has been forwarded to Rochester Police and Fire departments, and he did not send it to the Planning Board because then the details of its security arrangements would become public records for any potential thief to see. Johnson agreed to ask the Fire and Police chiefs for a look at their copies of it.

            The panel continued the public hearing until September 12 after approving the project’s two waiver requests: a reduced distance from the stormwater-treatment center of only 157.2 feet and a reduced distance between stormwater system and the sewerage system of 132 feet.

            Elsewhere on its August 8 agenda, the board approved a Certificate of Compliance for the solar project at 0 Walnut Plain Road and Old Middleboro Road after Johnson reported that all disturbed areas appear to be vegetated and stabilized.

            The board then approved a one-year extension of the Special Permit and Groundwater Protection District SP for the large-scale photovoltaic installation solar project at 0 Snipatuit Road.

            Following this vote, the board accepted a request to continue until September 12 its public hearing into the Site Plan Review application for a tree and perennials nursery at 157 Vaughan Hill Road filed by Jennifer and Chuck Anderson.

            The Rochester Planning Board’s next meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 12, at 7:00 pm at Town Hall, 1 Constitution Way.

Rochester Planning Board

By Michael J. DeCicco

            A majority of the Marion Planning Board indicated during Monday night’s public meeting at the Police Station that it would favor “sunsetting” the Inclusionary Housing Bylaw once the town surpasses the state-required 10% in affordable housing.

            According to the 2020 Census, Marion is at 7.03%.

            While it’s been widely presumed that the town will go well beyond 10% with the building of Heron Cove Estates, a 120-unit, affordable-housing rental development off Route 6 near the Wareham line, builder Ken Steen has yet to pull a building permit for his Local Initiative Program (LIP) project that was negotiated with town leaders and vetted by the state and Marion’s Zoning Board of Appeals.

            Citing these facts, Planning Board member Eileen Marum said, “I’m trying to keep the community in safe harbor, and the only way you can do that (is via the Inclusionary Housing) bylaw.”

            The bylaw requires the builders of residential developments of six or more units to add affordable-housing units or pay the town a fee.

            Developer Matt Zuker, who is planning a 48-unit, townhouse-style, residential complex of market-rate homes for sale, told the Planning Board this year that his compliance with the bylaw will be a payment. “From a business standpoint, it just doesn’t make sense (to build “affordable” units.)… It’s a significant delta … $75,000 per unit, and the sale price is tied to the state,” said Zuker in an earlier presubmission conference.

            The 20-year-old bylaw, opponents are eager to point out, has not resulted in a single “affordable” unit being built.

            Planning Board Chairman Tucker Burr, Vice Chairman Andrew Daniel and members Jon Henry and Dale Jones said Monday night that they would support a sunset provision.

            “The cost of construction to build affordable, there’s no return on investment. Who in their right mind would do that?” asked Daniel.

            With that, Jones motioned to sunset the bylaw. But more discussion ensued, and the matter never reached a vote. A public hearing would be a necessary step prior to a vote that would put the matter before voters at Town Meeting. A town vote would make sunsetting the bylaw subject to attorney-general approval.

            “You cannot make a unilateral decision amongst yourselves, you’re going to have to involve the (Affordable) Housing Trust,” said Select Board member (and former Planning Board Chairman) Norm Hills, who represents the Select Board to the AHT.

            When Hills was still chairman of the Planning Board, he debated in favor of retaining the bylaw. Disputing Henry’s assertion that Little Neck Village costs the town $10,000,000, Hills referenced interaction with Finance Director Judy Mooney and said the number is probably less than $1,000,000.

            Marum and Toby Ast, a member of the town’s Affordable Housing Trust, asserted that the problem in Marion stems from the zoning bylaws’ application to single-family homes.

            While opposed to the Inclusionary Housing Bylaw, Daniel has expressed in past meetings an interest in higher density for single-family homes in Marion.

            Local developer Sherman Briggs, in attendance on Monday for another matter (see below), has made no secret about his longstanding desire to build a townhouse-style residential complex but remains vehemently opposed to Marion’s Inclusionary Housing Bylaw.

            “If you all read it, it leads us right into a 40B project … No matter where we are (in affordable housing), that bylaw gives a developer the right to do a 40B,” Briggs said, calling the bylaw “discrimination to people that don’t qualify for affordable housing. I think it’s totally wrong. I’d like to get … Town Counsel on how he reads that bylaw.”

            On the advice of Town Planner Doug Guey-Lee and Building Commissioner Bob Grillo, the Planning Board voted to require major site-plan review for the construction of the new Marion Department of Public Works operations center at Benson Brook.

            Given the extensive work done by the town-appointed Building Committee over the past year, the board was leaning toward only minor site-plan review until Grillo pointed out that the project exceeds the square-footage threshold necessitating major site-plan review.

            Grillo and Guey-Lee stressed, however, that the board can condition major site-plan review in a manner that negates certain triggers that Burr read from the bylaws.

            The Presubmission Conference featured a summary presentation by Ken Motta of Field Engineering, who was representing the DPW.

            As Motta summarized, the plan for a 14,400 square-foot facilities building on the westerly side of the town’s Wastewater Treatment Plant is the result of an extensive planning effort involving himself, Grillo and the Building Committee team appointed by the town.

            Motta said there has been “little to no clearing” on the contiguous lots where the new DPW will be built, except for the area of the storage facility and a water-quality swale to absorb parking-lot runoff.

            The building, which is being designed by Will Saltonstall, is proposed per the Building Committee as a wood-truss design with metal skin on the outside, according to Randy Parker, the Select Board’s representative to the committee.

            It will be centrally located on one lot but spreading to the other two, and the footprint is entirely in the “lay-down” area adjacent to the water tower.

            Motta called it a “sustainable design” per zoning bylaws and the needs of the DPW. It will be connected to town sewer, have water service and a fire-service tap so the building “will be sprinklered,” he said.

            Touching on stormwater management, Motta said half the site will drain toward a single catch basin on the southerly side of the parking field and to a double catch basin on the north side. An existing stormwater detention basin, he said, has been in place for years and has never shown evidence of water, so Motta does not expect additional flows to cause capacity problems.

            Marum asked about potential grant funding for construction or state assistance, citing the support that Representative Bill Straus gave the town during its cleanup of the WTTP lagoon.

            Parker said grant funding has not been explored and noted that the town secured approval from voters at Town Meeting. “But we will take any grant money that comes in,” he said, suggesting funding for solar panels atop what has been described as a “solar-ready” roof.

            Jones, also on the committee, clarified that the structure has been designed to accept solar panels.

            “It’s on the radar screen … we’re still wrestling with budget numbers on this project,” said Motta.

            After several residents in attendance continued a discussion of their growing concern of short-term leases in residential neighborhoods, the board voted to make it a goal to write a bylaw for short-term rentals by 2024 Town Meeting.

            While Burr and Daniel initially expressed hesitancy to write a bylaw addressing the matter, Marum, Ryan Burke and Jon Henry thought it important to find a way to address the emerging concern.

            Marum brought research to the table, having reviewed existing bylaws in Barnstable and the sparsely populated town of Alford in the northwest corner of the state.

            “If things come to our level, there’s a problem. It’s going to have to be dealt with sooner or later,” said Henry.

            Burke suggested that if someone purchases a property without intention to live there, they are not living up to the zoning bylaw.

            Resident Charlie Cosman, who lives on Planting Island said, “now’s the time to get ahead of it.” He suggested that an inn openly operating as a commercial enterprise is keeping to all kinds of codes and rules, whereas investors buying residential properties can skirt those requirements.

            “The bylaw will not only protect the public but the owner,” said Cosman. “(Bed-and-breakfasts) in town are dictated very carefully what they have to do; the Airbnb’s should at least have that.”

            A lengthy discussion with land developer Sherman Briggs resulted in the board’s decision to lift a stop-work Enforcement Order pending a successful application on Briggs’ part for a Special Permit to complete the leveling off of his property off Spring Street (Map 24, Lot 36A, 37, 37A and 38) under Section 230-8.11 (A.)

            Given the floor, Briggs disputed that erosion control is an issue, noting that the lots lie below the grade of surrounding properties, including the bike path by 2.5 feet and Sippican Health Care Center by 2 feet.

            Marum asserted that the 3.5-acre site shows evidence of the removal of more than 1 acre of vegetation, a trigger point for remediation, but the board decided it was impossible to disprove Briggs’ statement that 85% of the vegetation removed occurred as far back as a dozen years ago as preparation for (failed) sale of the property to Baldwin Brothers.

            “It does require a special permit,” stated Grillo, citing that certain triggers have been met under the erosion-control section of the bylaws. “I’ve received a litany of calls from some abutters, and I felt that the issue needs to be addressed.”

            Briggs insisted to the board that there are no plans to raise the height of the property beyond its current grade and that he has no problem applying for a special permit.

            “All I want to do is go in there and clean up the existing piles,” he said, noting that he plans to work weekends in order to get the job done. “The fill that came in and went out came in when the Baldwin site was done. … We crushed all the material and took it off site. The bottom line is I’ve been an inconvenience to Baldwin Brothers and they’re complaining. I’ve probably got one weekend of work to get the majority (of the remaining work finished.) … I may be filing for the building permit, we’re getting that close.”

            The board quickly approved an Approval Not Required (ANR) application submitted by Alexander Biner for what representing engineer Brian Grady of G.A.F. Engineering called a minor land swap at 546 and 548 Point Road. There are no new lots as a result of the action.

            Member Dale Jones’ efforts to get the board to order business cards was voted down. Marion staff including Grillo, Guey-Lee and Planning Board administrator Terri Santos have cards.

            The next meeting of the Marion Planning Board is scheduled for Monday, August 21, at 7:00 pm at the Police Station.

Marion Planning Board

By Mick Colageo