ZBA Defines ‘Light Manufacturing’

on

Approving a definition of ‘light manufacturing’ under the Marion’s zoning by-law was the final step that the Zoning Board of Appeals needed to win in a Land Court lawsuit against the Town by two residents who were denied a building permit to construct a solar facility.

            Laura and Dale Briggs, owners of a parcel of land on County Road, filed their application before the Town had a solar by-law, and their application was denied because solar production is not regulated under the zoning by-law, and light manufacturing is not allowed in a residential zone.

            The Briggses were present on May 15 when Town Counsel Jon Whitten read the approved definition for light manufacturing relative to solar energy production.

            The zoning by-law defines light manufacturing as “fabrication, assembly, processing, finishing work, or packaging.”

            When Judge Alexander Sands found in favor of the Town in his decision rendered on February 6, 2014, he ordered the Town to relate the definition of light manufacturing to solar energy production before he could find in favor of the Town, which is what Whitten read aloud during the meeting.

            “Solar facilities utilize ‘solar cells’ … to convert sunlight to electricity for commercial sale. The conversion of sunlight to electricity for commercial sale entails ‘processing’ as that term is used in the by-law definition of ‘light manufacturing,” said Whitten.

            “That’s just totally not true,” said Norman Hills, a member of the Planning Board and Conservation Commission, and who was present that evening. “There is no production involved.”

            “But you’re producing energy,” replied Chairman Eric Pierce. He added that it was a commercial activity in a residential zone, as well.

            “We’ve got plenty of businesses in residential areas,” said Hills, “so it’s not unheard of.”

            Resident Jennifer Francis used cranberry bogs as an analogy of allowed commercial uses within residential zones under the zoning by-law. She said in cranberry bogs, the growing and the harvesting is more of a complex production.

            “Whereas solar panels just sit there,” said Francis. “They make no sound.”

            Francis then questioned the board’s motive for the initial denial of the permit.

            “Why are you so bent on disallowing this use?” asked Francis. “You’re just pulling at straws to find some way to call this light manufacturing so you can shut it down.”

            She said Town Meeting just approved a solar by-law, so clearly the Town is “OK with solar.”

            “You’re not representing the sentiment or the spirit of the Town,” said Francis.

            Whitten fired back, saying the board was upholding the law, and the zoning by-law did not allow this type of use.

            “I don’t think anybody’s opposed to this project,” said Whitten. “And the analogy of the cranberry bogs to solar farms is not a helpful one.”

            He said the Briggses could have applied with the Planning Board under the zoning by-law, but they chose not to do that, probably, he said, because it would trigger a site plan review and special permit process.

            “As your attorney, I’m trying to uphold the rule of law,” said Whitten. He said if the Town should arbitrarily allow certain projects that it liked, in spite of the zoning by-laws, it would be “a world of anarchy.”

            Whitten told the residents that if the Briggses acted now, “This project could be up and running … by the end of June, first week of July.”

            Another resident chastised the board for the delay and costs accrued in fighting the building permit application.

            “And it just raises the blood pressure of this town,” he said.

            “I agree with you,” said Pierce. “We should’ve had a solar by-law … years ago.”

            After the meeting, in a follow-up interview, the Briggs said they will move forward with applying for a variance with the ZBA under the new solar by-law, and they will do it promptly.

By Jean Perry

MRzba_052214

Mattapoisett Road Race: Who Runs?

on

Who are the people who get up early on the 4th of July to make their way to Mattapoisett so they can run five miles? When most of us are relaxing or gearing up for the annual cookout, approximately 1,000 runners are heading to Shipyard Park. There is no typical runner. An equal number of men and women run. Some have lots of running experience; some not so much. And age is just a number for these runners. Meet some of these long-time runners.

Last year, Joe Fernandez ran his 18th race and was the oldest runner. According to Mr. Fernandez, he finds the Mattapoisett Road Race “well run” (no pun intended) and the route “picturesque.” However, he may not run this year because he will be 85. For those who were wondering about the cut-off age, it just might be 84. In 1972, a new division was added for “aging runners” over 26. Apparently the Race Committee hadn’t met someone like Joe Fernandez.

When Patrick Callahan ran in the 39th Road Race, he was doing something he had first done 28 years earlier at the age of eight. In 2007, 40- year old George Luke won the race by out distancing many younger men. Marge Belisle, at 52, outran the younger women in the same race to win the women’s division.

Last year, the oldest female runner, Cathy Martens, said her favorite race memory was the year she won her division (women over 70) and didn’t know she won until she saw it in the paper the next morning. Although her “weak knees and even weaker constitution” require walking the five miles now, she enjoys every minute of it. She races with a friend and they talk the whole way. According to Mrs. Martens “it is amazing how many problems you can solve, how many laughs you can have, and how fast you can walk as you talk.” She would love to see many more “mature” runners/walkers participate. As she said “it is a great way to spend an hour or two.” For many of us, it would probably be more like three or four hours. But as Mrs. Martens said, “It is a great way to support the community.”

For Peter Martin, who will be running his 36th straight race this year, the race is “synonymous” with summer. Over the years he has had siblings, cousins and his own children run the race. Karen Manning, a 20-year member of the Race Committee, has run the race for 30 years. Mrs. Manning said the most striking quality is the “ever-present enthusiasm” that pervades every aspect of the race. From Race Committee meetings to registration where past races are discussed to the laughter shared with spectators along the route, this sense of joy and “spirit of the 4th shines brightly.” The Mattapoisett Road Race is truly a race for everyone.

MNHM Summer Programs

on

Come and enjoy the summer in Marion with the Marion Natural History Museum’s Summer Programs.

Life along the Shore: During this program, we will be visiting the shoreline and exploring the plants and animals that live in our area’s many coastal habitats. With the use of games, journals, introductory science techniques and hands-on activities, this will be a wonderful first look at life in our coastal environment. For students entering grades 1 and 2.

Coastal Explorations I & II: The Coastal Explorations I program will feature explorations of our rocky intertidal shoreline, salt marshes, estuaries as well as freshwater riverbanks, swamps, ponds and bogs. We will look at the birds, amphibians, fish and invertebrates that make these areas so special. For students entering grades 3 and 4.

During our Coastal Explorations II program, we will further enjoy the unique habitats Marion has to offer, including several field trips to expand our knowledge of our Coastal and Freshwater ecosystems. For students entering grades 5-7.

Dates and time for all sessions are:

Session I: July 7 – July 18, 2014

Session II: August 4 – August 15, 2014

Sessions will be held from 9:00 am – noon, Monday – Friday

Cost: $200 with membership and $250 for nonmembers

Registration is limited to 15 students per group, so register early to guarantee your child a spot. To register for these programs, please visit the Marion Natural History Museum website: www.marionmuseum.org, print out a registration form, and submit with payment. Summer will be here before we know it!

Marion Fire Fighters Association

on

The Marion Fire Fighters Association is honored to recognize the lifetime commitment and dedication of service to the Marion Fire Department by Deputy Chief Nathan B. Nye, Sr. In collaboration with the Nye Family and F.F. Brian Avila, an engraved dedication monument will be placed at the entrance to Marion Fire Station Two where Deputy Chief Nye served during his 55 years on the Department. An annual scholarship fund has also been set up in his name and will be awarded at this year’s ORRHS Awards Night. The Marion Fire Fighters Association is accepting donations to assist in funding these endeavors. Donations can be sent to: Marion Fire Fighters Association, P. O. Box 114, Marion, MA 02738. Please include “Nate Nye” on the check so that we can ensure the donations go into the proper account.

Tense Moments at ConCom Meeting

on

The May 14 agenda of the Mattapoisett Conservation Commission could have borne the title of ‘Water, Water Everywhere’ as several items the commission heard during the course of the meeting dealt with too much water in all the wrong places.

The two cases causing the most controversy were drainage issues at Appaloosa Lane and at Brandt Point Village. Developers or their representatives were asked to attend the meeting to address specific ConCom issues.

Brian Grady of GAF Engineering was on hand to answer questions regarding expansion of drainage basins associated with the housing development on Appaloosa Lane. Residents along River Road came out to complain that since the developer has resumed work on engineered drainage basins, water has been flowing into their yards. Also referred to as retention ponds, these water collectors were designed to be ‘dry.’ However, with a high water table and wet weather conditions, they have been full and overflowing. As the construction team attempted to move water from one basin to the other, it was discovered that the soil content is mostly clay, causing Conservation Agent Liz Leidhold to wonder aloud if they would ever be able to sufficiently re-charge water back into the ground. Highway Superintendent Barry Denham shared those concerns from his own observation of the soil.

It was also brought to the commission’s attention that a vast amount of soil material had been dug out and piled high at the site rather than being removed from the area. Denham said, “I didn’t receive any notification that work would be taking place there … they have removed a significant amount of material (but) I don’t know why it wasn’t removed off site … I question if it’s (drainage basins) going to be able to handle storm water … they were supposed to be dry basins.” Nearly at a whisper he commented, “How can they install a septic system when the water is so close to ground level?” Commission member Bob Rogers replied, “Well, that’s not for us to determine.”

Patricia Apperson, a River Road resident, said that pumps and hoses were being used that very day to suck water out of one of the basins. However, the hoses were placed in such a manner that the water purposefully flowed into her yard. She said that every time someone new purchased the land, new and greater water problems were created and yet it seemed that developers were being given increasingly easier permissions. Brian Cook of 11 River Road stated he now had water in his basement for the first time.

Chairman Peter Newton said that the first step had to be to allow the developer to complete the drainage work as engineered and then to see where things stood. This did not appease the neighbors whose frustrations were very evident.

Grady will visit the site and continue to work with the contractor on ways to eliminate some of the drainage problems and report back to the commission.

The Brandt Point Village cluster housing project received equal, if not greater, outrage from residents in that area. Coming before the commission was Curtis Mello, one of the development trust partners. The commission wished to discuss the long-overdue wetlands remediation area. But it was drainage issues on the minds of abutters. A naturally flowing historic brook had been planned to accept storm water re-charged into the surrounding area. Denham again spoke and said that three drainage easements on Gary Lane adjacent to the site ran into the brook already, but that the brook was not part of any easement and, therefore, he couldn’t clean it out to help it flow better. He questioned if the brook would be viable to handle more.

Denham said that when angry residents call him for help with drainage issues, he is faced with housing developments where “developers don’t seem to follow their plans.”

The developers of Brandt Point Village are seeking to amend plans through the Planning Board on May 19 at 7:00 pm at Center School. The commission voted to send a letter to the Planning Board asking them to review ConCom’s mandate for completion of the 3500-square foot wetlands remediation during that hearing.

But vocal opponent to the proposed changes at this site, Paul Osenkowski, felt not enough was being done by the commission to protect this vulnerable area. He asked, “Why can’t we stop it now! They haven’t followed the rules for five years and now we’re supposed to change the rules in the middle of the game?” Rick Coty of Gary Lane said, “The area is a mess.”

Earlier in the evening, a certificate of compliance was issued for 7 Nantucket Drive at this development, with Bob Rogers noting that new homeowners shouldn’t be penalized because the developer has failed to complete wetland remediation.

To the chagrin of Osenkowski and residents of Gary Lane, members of the commission – including Mike King, Bob Rogers and Chairman Newton – all asserted that the best way to make things right at this location were efforts to work with the developer, not to penalize him. King said that the present owner “had inherited a problem he is trying to fix.”

On a lighter note in the agenda, Evan Roznoy, a local Boy Scout, came before the commission with his plan to build handicap ramps at the restrooms located on Ned’s Point. This will be his Eagle Scout project. After explaining to Roznoy why it was necessary for his project to receive ConCom approval, Chairman Newton thanked Roznoy as they voted in the affirmative. Those in attendance echoed their approval via applause.

Mark Julien of 30 Ocean Drive received a negative two approval for replacing an existing gravel driveway with asphalt to install a half-court basketball play area.

Richard Charon, representing Blue Wave LLC, came before the commission with an update on the proposed Crystal Spring commercial solar field. After further research, some minor changes were made to the site plan and he reaffirmed that flooding in the area was caused by poor drainage along the roadway.

Alan Decker of the Buzzards Bay Coalition came before ConCom for them to sign documents pursuant to land that will come under protective purview. With land grant funds in the amount of $300,000 available for only a few more weeks, the commission moved forward as required. The 27-acre site that the town voted to accept during last Fall’s town meeting will now be conveyed into protection.

ConCom members Marylou Kelliher and Mike King volunteered to be part of the Soil Conservation Board. The Board of Selectmen will need to approve their assignment.

The next meeting of the Mattapoisett Conservation Commission is scheduled for May 28 at 6:30 pm in town hall.

By Marilou Newell

MTCC_052214

Staff Embraces New Lockdown Procedure

on

Twenty teachers huddled in the back of a classroom. Lights out, door locked, a decision was made. Within seconds, the teachers had every desk in the room pressed up against the door – a barricade was formed. A minute later, the door shook violently, but the barricade held.

Round two. Without a barricade, the door banged open. An officer entered, shouting and throwing red balls like bullets. In an instant, a few teachers reacted, taking her down by the waist. “I still have my gun!” she informed them, perhaps more kindly than a true intruder would have. A staff member stomped on the hand waving the feigned gun. Safe.

Down the hall, another police officer barged into a classroom, firing an airsoft gun at the ankles of a group of teachers armed with scissors. A short time later, a group of staff members were caught by an “intruder” while attempting an escape out a side door.

This was the training Old Rochester Regional High School’s staff went through last Wednesday in preparation for the school’s new lockdown procedure. Police officers from surrounding districts acted as intruders throughout the afternoon exercise as ORR’s staff learned how to react. It was realistic; it was intense.

“They kept using the word ‘empowerment.’ You’re empowering. You can make a choice. You can flee; you can try to get those kids out of the building,” reflected Merrideth Wickman, an English teacher at ORR. “No rules apply, meaning your ultimate goal is survival.”

The program is called ALICE – Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Choices, Evacuate – explained Michael Parker, ORRHS’s assistant principal. Originally created by a concerned police officer in Texas roughly ten years ago, ALICE has since spread across America. The program gives teachers something the old lockdown procedure never did: choices.

“In the traditional lockdown, you shut the door. You lock the door. You pull the curtains. You hide. There are no options,” said Parker, “In the ALICE program, you still do a traditional lockdown, but then you make a decision on what to do based on the situation after that.”

This “enhanced lockdown procedure” allows teachers to decide when it’s necessary to remain in lockdown, barricade the door, counterattack, or evacuate. If an intruder were to enter the building, an average of four to six minutes would pass before the police could arrive and enter using their own swipe cards. A lot can happen during these crucial minutes.

“The key part is you have to assess it personally to decide your course of action based on where the intruder is in the building,” recalled Wickman. As an intruder walks the halls, he or she can be tracked using the school’s camera system. Then Parker, Principal Michael Devoll, Campus Aid Bill Tilden, or any secretary can announce the intruder’s position over the loud speakers. This allows the individuals in lockdown to make educated decisions.

“I think this is a much better situation. I would much rather do this than be sitting ducks,” said English teacher Kate Ribeiro. Her only criticism of the new system was that she felt all teachers should have the code to the loud speakers, allowing everyone to share information in case of an emergency.

Before the ALICE training simulations last Wednesday, the staff first went through a general presentation explaining the program. The presentation included studies on how ALICE would have benefitted schools of past tragedies, such as Columbine and Virginia Tech, if the enhanced lockdown procedure had been utilized.

“They showed awful graphs about how many people could’ve been saved,” said Ribeiro, recounting how there was an exit in the library of Columbine High School, where many students were killed. Instead of running to safety, the students simply hid.

That’s not to say the traditional lockdown procedure is completely useless – it’s just better suited for keeping threats outside school walls. Once the threat is inside the building, ALICE becomes the most logical program to utilize.

“There are pros to the regular lockdown,” admitted Parker. “It does keep everybody secure and safe in one place. The pro to the enhanced lockdown system is that you can get people to get out of harm’s way.”

Once briefed, ORR’s staff was split into groups of 15 to 20 people in order to simulate ALICE procedures. They were given the option to opt-out and simply watch the procedure, but as Wickman laughed, “We didn’t know what was coming, so we didn’t know if we wanted to opt-out.”

They caught on soon enough. When it came to barricades, the staff learned that it takes only seconds for twenty people to push all the desks in a room to one corner. The door could also be secured with something as simple as a wooden wedge, if you had enough, or with a strap tied between the door handle and something stationary.

When the police officers began acting as intruders, the staff learned the last resort tactic: counterattack. “You’ll never look at your classroom the same again, because you start looking for weapons,” said Wickman, quoting an officer from her group. “You don’t know what you have right in your own means that you could use as a weapon.”

Anything from a textbook to a pair a scissors could be used in self-defense. “Hopefully we never have to do this, but it makes more sense than just sitting in a dark room in a corner,” admitted Ribeiro.

It was in this phase of the training that each staff member’s fight or flight instincts showed. Wickman noted how some of her colleagues always ran toward the danger, while others were more likely to hold back.

Ribeiro said some of her colleagues are also in the military, so they’ve been trained to go against their natural reactions. “Your natural instinct, first, is to run away, or cower. When you’re in the military, your natural instinct is to run towards that danger,” they told her.

These types of personality differences have an impact on what a teacher decides to do in a crisis. Some may have a clear mind during an emergency, while others may freeze. If the latter situation were to occur, teachers were told that it’s okay to accept a student’s advice. In a moment of fear, a student may see an option that the teacher does not.

On the other hand, if a student were to freeze and entirely refuse to follow instructions, the teacher may not sacrifice the class for the sake of one. It’s the student’s choice to stay behind if the class is evacuating. This is one of the most difficult situations the staff was forced to consider. “A teacher’s instinct is to stay and protect that child, I think,” said Wickman, noting the difficulty of that type of situation.

As a teacher, the fear of making the wrong decision is terrifying. They were instructed to just follow their instincts to decide what would be best for the class. The ultimate goal is to stay alive.

Despite the intensity of Wednesday’s training, the ALICE program primarily had a positive response. The staff recognized the empowerment behind having options in case of an emergency. Only a few felt uncomfortable with the dramatics of the training.

“Someone is always going to be insulted that they’re bringing this into our school,” Ribeiro said, “but I’d rather insult a handful of people and feel like I’ve been empowered with the knowledge on how to protect my kids.”

With these positive responses from the staff, Parker feels Wednesday’s training went very well. “The nice thing about it is that we have time between now and next year for teachers to have questions, voice their concerns,” he said. “We’re going to train the students after the seniors leave, and have it ready to roll as a full-blown new system in the fall.”

Spring training for the underclassmen will be primarily informational, with enhanced lockdown drills beginning next fall.

In other news, both the senior and junior class held some fun events last week. The senior class had their annual senior breakfast at the VFW last Tuesday, where they enjoyed a catered breakfast in celebration of their last week of school. On Friday, the junior class held their junior semi dance and overnight party at the high school.

By Renae Reints

Weweantic Boat Fire Difficult to Reach

on

The Marion and Wareham Fire Department’s responded to reports of a boat fire in the Weweantic River at just after 3pm Friday. They found a large catamaran fully involved and about 1000 feet off the Weweantic River highway overpass. Accessing the craft was difficult due to the proximity to roadways. The Wareham Fire Department reported that all passengers had been removed from the boat.

Free Movie: Last Tuesday of the Month

on

The Monuments Men (PG-13, 1 hr. 52 min.) is playing at the Mattapoisett Senior Center, Center School, Barstow St., on Tuesday, May 27 at 12:00 noon. Sponsored by the Friends of the Mattapoisett Council on Aging (formally known as the Friends of the Elderly), the movie is free.

You get two pizza slices for only $2 prepaid. Pay for your pizza at the Senior Center by Monday, May 26. Also, reserve your seat – so we’ll know how many chairs are needed.

The Monuments Men is an action drama about a WW II platoon tasked by FDR with going into Germany to rescue artistic masterpieces from the Nazis. The art is trapped behind enemy lines, and the German army is under orders to destroy everything as the Reich falls. The Monuments Men, as they were called, would risk their lives to protect and defend mankind’s greatest achievements. This movie stars George Clooney, Matt Damon, Bill Murray, John Goodman, Jean Dujardin, Bob Balaban, Hugh Bonneville, and Cate Blanchett.

Four Teams Clinch Share of SCC Title

on

Here is a look at the seventh week of scheduled games for ORR spring athletics.

Baseball: Though the ORR baseball team has yet to clinch their share in an SCC title, they certainly seem poised to do so, evident in their fairly successful week. The boys won an important game over Dighton-Rehoboth, 9-3, ending an eight-game win streak for the Falcons who were in top contention for the conference title. Ryan Plunkett did well from the pitcher’s mound, striking out five and only allowing five hits, while classmate Andrew Ryan went 2-for-4 from the plate, scoring two runs and recording three RBIs. The Bulldogs did suffer a blow towards the end of the week, however, suffering a 1-0 loss to Seekonk. Though it is a minor setback, it only marked the Bulldogs’ third conference loss, keeping them in a great position to win the SCC.

Softball: The Lady Bulldogs continued to face some troubles this week, as they lost two of their three games. The girls suffered tough losses to Dighton-Rehoboth, 7-5, in an eight-inning thriller, and to Apponequet, 6-0. Against DR, the girls had a close game, with Kaleigh Goulart once again leading the team offensively and defensively. Goulart got support from several players including sisters Hannah Guard and Michaela Guard, who each had two hits, and Madison Cristaldi, who notched her first varsity hit. Unfortunately, it would not be enough to secure the win for ORR, as the girls lost in extra innings. The one bright spot for the girls was a 9-2 win over Seekonk, marking their fifth win of the season.

Boys’ Track: The boys clinched a share in the SCC title this week, defeating Seekonk 78-58 and suffering a 78-58 loss to GNB Voc-Tech to end their season with a 7-1 record. Going into the meet, the Bulldogs needed a victory over GNB Voc-Tech to secure the outright SCC championship, but despite great performances by multiple-event winners Mike Wyman (mile, two-mile), Kevin Saccone (400-hurdles, 110-hurdles, triple jump), and Jack Smith (100-meter, 200-meter), the Bulldogs came up short, forcing a three-way tie between themselves, Voc-Tech, and Dighton-Rehoboth. The meet marked the end of the regular season for the boys, who now look to secure the SCC Championship Meet title and a Division 4 state championship.

Girls’ Track: The Lady Bulldogs also clinched the SCC title in a dual meet against Seekonk and GNB Voc-Tech, but unlike the boys, they clinched it outright, marking their fifth consecutive undefeated championship season. The girls defeated Seekonk 94-41 and GNB Voc-Tech 115-23. The girls won several events, including all of the throwing events, with Jill Sethares taking the shot-put, Morgan Browning winning the discus, and Nicole Gifford winning the javelin. The girls also swept the distance events thanks to Sam Barrett (two-mile), Shannon O’Malley (800-meter) and Rachel Scheub (one-mile). Like the boys, the girls now look to the conference meet and divisional meet to continue their dominant season.

Boys’ Tennis: The boys had a fantastic week this week, securing a share of the SCC title and winning both of their matches. The Bulldogs easily defeated Wareham 5-0, with the Vikings forfeiting their last two matches after the Bulldogs had secured the victory. Later in the week, ORR extended their winning streak to nine games, defeating Case 5-0. The win also guarantees the Bulldogs a share in the SCC crown, which they could claim outright with a win over Dighton-Rehoboth later in the season.

Girls’ Tennis: The girls also had a good week this week, winning two of their three matches. The Lady Bulldogs defeated Case 5-0 and Wareham 3-2, but lost a match early in the week to Dartmouth, who defeated ORR 4-1. The loss marked the girls’ fifth loss of the season, and though by no means is that a bad thing, it most likely puts them out of conference contention.

Boys’ Lacrosse: The boys’ lacrosse team had a good week, winning both of their games, securing a share of the SCC crown, and clinching a playoff berth. The Bulldogs defeated GNB Voc-Tech, 15-5, and out-of-conference Upper Cape, 14-3, to clinch their ninth and tenth wins of the season. Against Upper Cape, freshman Landon Goguen scored four goals, with junior Ethan Lizotte and sophomore Chris Nadeau adding three apiece. The boys’ win against GNB Voc-Tech was also important, as it allowed them to gain a share of the SCC title with Apponequet.

Girls’ Lacrosse: Thanks to strong offensive performances, the Lady Bulldogs managed to win all three of their games this week against Abington, GNB Voc-Tech, and Coyle-Cassidy. The girls blew out Abington 17-3, with Tori Saltmarsh, Maggie Wiggin, and Mikayla Demanche all scoring three goals apiece to lead the Bulldogs offensively. Demanche and fellow classmate Bailey Truesdale would each score two to lead the girls to a 10-3 victory over GNB Voc-Tech later in the week. Finally, Truesdale had a whopping six goals in an 18-8 victory over out-of-conference Coyle-Cassidy. The six goals were also important as they put Truesdale’s career goals at 98, just two shy of the century mark, a milestone that ought to be reached, as the girls have two regular season games and a playoff run remaining.

Below are the overall spring team records, followed by the conference records in wins, losses, and ties as of May 18.

Baseball: (12-4-0) (11-3-0); Softball: (5-10-0) (5-10-0); Boys’ Track (7-1-0) (7-1-0); Girls’ Track (8-0-0) (8-0-0); Boys’ Tennis: (13-3-0) (13-1-0); Girls’ Tennis: (10-6-0) (9-4-0); Boys’ Lacrosse: (10-5-0) (8-1-0); Girls’ Lacrosse: (14-4-0) (4-4-0).

By Michael Kassabian