A dental care program that Rochester Memorial School Nurse Ellen Murphy proposed to the Rochester School Committee last month was approved on February 15.

Beginning this year, RMS students will be offered dental care by Mass Smiles, a program that will visit the school every six months and provide dental care such as screenings, cleanings, sealants, fillings, and fluoride treatments to students whose parents enroll their child into the program. Dental work would be given during school hours and scheduled around specialist classes to avoid critical time blocks like ELA and math.

During its last meeting, the committee had some questions for Murphy, who contacted other Massachusetts schools that participate in the Mass Smiles program. All the feedback, she said, was favorable.

Murphy last month said Mass Smiles first contacted RMS due to an increase in free or reduced lunch participation. The target student population at RMS are students enrolled in the Medicare or Medicaid who would receive the dental care for free, but students with private insurance – or no insurance – are welcome to participate as well.

“There is a high percentage of kids in the state with Medicaid who aren’t seeing the dentist at all,” said Murphy. “[The program] is not looking for private insurance or people to change dentists,” she added, “it’s more for those who aren’t getting dental care.”

The program is a for-profit organization, Murphy said, servicing 19 states and 500,000 children, but she emphasized that if there are any balances due to treatment costs or co-payments, at the end of the month any balances are wiped clean.

“If they get paid, great,” said Murphy. “If they don’t, it’s (the balance) gone.”

Murphy spoke with the school nurse of one of the Wareham schools participating in the program servicing roughly 500 students, saying, “She couldn’t say enough about this program.”

“She had one little boy with serious decay into his roots,” said Murphy. “The [Mass Smiles] dentist treating him … called in a prescription for antibiotics … and followed up with his family.”

Murphy said the Department of Public Health also runs a similar program, “But all they do is cleanings,” Murphy said. “They don’t do sealants. They don’t do fillings.”

The typical time a student will spend with the dentist would be 15 to 25 minutes, Murphy told the committee.

“The aim of the program is to keep kids in school,” said Murphy. “Nationally, fifty-five million hours of school are missed as a result of dental concerns.”

Tooth decay is five times more common than asthma in children, Murphy stated. According to the Center for Disease Control, Murphy said dental sealants prevent 80% of cavities for two years and 50% of cavities for up to four years. Children without sealants have three times more cavities than those with sealants, she added.

Last month, School Committee member Sharon Hartley asked if the program could service children after school, but during this meeting Murphy told her that the program could not accommodate that request.

RMS Principal Derek Medeiros voiced his support for the program.

“As a school, we always worry we’re not impeding too much on parents … but this is just offering the program to anyone who wants to take it,” said Medeiros. The goal is to offer the program and see if there is any interest over the next three or so months.

“It’s worth a discussion I thought, especially with the data that Ellen presented,” Medeiros said. “There’s no obligation up front. It’s just, hey, we have this if you’re interested…”

Murphy emphasized that there is no cost or liability to the school.

“It sounds like it’s worth giving it a try,” said Hartley. “I am a little concerned about the time just because it’s so tricky these days to get everything in that we have to get in.”

Medeiros replied, “We have the structure in place for all the screenings that Ellen does already… We have the experience from that lens.” Medeiros continued.

The committee approved the Mass Smiles program and requested that Murphy return at the end of the year for a follow-up on the program’s progress.

The next meeting of the Rochester School Committee is scheduled for March 29 at 6:30 pm at the Rochester Town Hall.

Rochester School Committee

By Jean Perry

The Rochester Planning Board closed the public hearing for large-scale solar developer Borrego Solar Systems for its proposed solar project at 453 Rounseville Road at the corner of Mendell Road, and although the project is nearing the finish line and is poised for approval, Planning Board Chairman Arnold Johnson reminded everyone on February 13 that the project may get approved or it might not – “We don’t know yet.”

Aside from a clerical error on the Mylar plans, Borrego is on track in its progress, with Borrego representative Steve Long telling the board in reference to its peer review engineer’s letter, “I think we’ve addressed every comment.”

Johnson opened it up to the public for one last chance at final comments, which prompted Johnson to disclose some of his thoughts on solar in Rochester.

Abutter Kimberly Bindas of 14 Mendell Road urged the board to review the information packet she submitted pertaining to electromagnetic frequency readings and the risks EMFs have, including childhood leukemia, she said. “It’s something that’s very serious to me,” she told the board. Board member and electrical technician John DiMaggio stated that he would review the information and consider it between then and the next meeting.

Hiller Road resident (and candidate for Board of Selectmen) Cathy Mendoza took the opportunity to voice her support for the residents affected by the proposed solar farm and asked the board to look over at Lakeville and its Board of Selectmen’s intervention in a proposal to install solar panels at the train station.

“We’re bound by our rules and regulations,” said Johnson, “and not a popularity contest.” But that would be something to bring to the selectmen, not the Planning Board, he said.

“We have to be careful when we represent the town when we go to litigation because if we go to litigation, we don’t want to lose on something that we don’t have a purview…”

Mendoza herself recently told the Zoning Board of Appeals that she might file a lawsuit against the town over her appeal of the Planning Board’s Site Plan Review approval for her abutting neighbor Wellspring Farms.

Johnson said that he was actually about to meet with the Selectmen’s Office the next day regarding the Board of Selectmen’s desire to explore the state status of “Green Community” for Rochester. It was the selectmen’s initiative, Johnson said, adding that components to becoming a Green Community often involve “expedited” permitting to solar and wind energy projects.

Planning Board member Ben Bailey punctuated Mendoza’s every other sentence with a question on the relevance to the Planning Board hearing, and after a few more of Bailey’s suggestions to keep to the matter at hand, the back and forth between Mendoza and Johnson ceased.

Another abutter wondered how Rochester could become a Green Community “when it’s covered with black solar panels.”

After some frustrated comments from other abutters, Johnson told them that the board does listen to them.

“And we’ve adjusted this project,” he said, and the project has even been pushed back away from the road as a consequence of abutters’ comments. “We have listened, and we’ve had them make some pretty significant adjustments.”

Planning Board member Gary Florindo added, “I don’t want any of you to think that we’re not concerned … because we are.”

He lamented the fact that, after the struggles that other neighborhoods have endured, including the New Bedford Road residents who turned out to Planning Board meetings in droves for weeks, those neighbors were now not present to support the Rounseville and Mendell Road residents now facing the same.

“Maybe they are backing you,” said Florindo, “but they’re not here to back you. I feel – and I know where you’re coming from, I really do – that’s why when I look at this thing, I’m at a loss right now because there are certain things that we have to do.” It’s the process, he said.

But at the same time, Florindo said, the landowners are the ones coming forward, reaching out to solar developers because that is what they want to do with their land.

“I’m old enough to remember when the farms around here had barbed wire and cows everywhere, and I would rather see the barbed wire and cows,” he said, as opposed to the stockade fences surrounding the once open fields.

“I’m doing the best I can with what I have to do for you people,” Florindo said. “If [the Borrego project] does go through, I’ll be at that site watching, making sure it’s done the way it’s supposed to be done.”

Perhaps, said Johnson, after the 25-year life of the project, the stockade fences will come down and those fields turned solar farms will simply be open fields again.

Johnson said he has considered the petition the residents submitted with 120 signatures.

“We did take the petition into account,” stated Johnson. “The board is still working to look at the solar bylaw that we have currently on the books … to somehow slow these things (solar farm applications) down a little bit.

“Because right now, it’s not like 40B housing,” continued Johnson. “Forty-B can be capped … but there’s no cap on saying the town can handle ‘x’ amount of megawatts and then we can say, okay, we’re done. So we’re working on trying to find some ways. It may not help over [at Rounseville Road], but a town as a whole.… We are trying to look at ways to maybe slow it down. The bylaw is a tough bylaw … and an expensive bylaw (because of high bonds).”

Long told the residents that the landowner approached Borrego, and by looking at the zoning and the rules of Rochester, he has done his best to make the project work for his client.

“This is the hardest bylaw of any,” said Long, referring to other towns in the state he has worked in. “They’ve adjusted and asked for more and we agreed to it. You won’t see it … it’ll be the best it can be – so we should be allowed to do what we want to do with this property.”

Johnson said the board would likely take a vote two meetings from then on March 13 after an initial review of the draft decision on February 27.

Also during the meeting, the board approved Madeleine Monteiro’s request to withdraw her application without prejudice for a Special Permit for a Back Lot at 0 Walnut Plain Road.

The board also approved three Approval Not Required applications for Gerard Lorusso/Edgewood Development for Horse Neck Drive, Box Turtle Drive, and Forbes Road all located at Connet Woods. Johnson said in a past approval, the board had granted the developer the option to shift some lot lines should percolation test concerns arise.

“It doesn’t add or subtract house lots,” Johnsons said. “They’re just exercising their right … to move the lot lines.”

The next meeting of the Rochester Planning Board is scheduled for February 27 at 7:00 pm at the Rochester Town Hall.

Rochester Planning Board

By Jean Perry

After months of interesting topics like menthol cigarette bans and marijuana on the agenda, the Marion Board of Health on February 13 returned to more mundane issues with three public hearings for septic system variances.

David Davignon representing 12 North Drive was requesting relief from a second mandatory percolation test in the form of a variance.

Davignon said the property was a “unique property” built in 1750. The property features an L-shaped garage attached to a barn that was also likely built in 1750, according to Davignon.

The property has changed hands several times over the last two decades, and it is likely that the house has remained vacant for the most part for some 15 to 16 years now. The basement has about 3 to 4 feet of water in it, and much of the house is falling into disrepair, said Davignon.

The current owner now wishes to add some living space to that barn, bringing the total bedrooms up from six to eight.

The property needs a new septic system, and a perc test was performed back in 2013 with no issues. A second required perc test was to be performed, but as Davignon pointed out, it has been a wild winter with loads of rain followed by deep freezes and intermittent storms.

“It’s not the ideal time of year for perc tests,” said Davignon.

As the board considered the request, Health Agent Karen Walega advised the board members, “The (soil) material’s not going to change. It’s going to be the same material (as in 2013).”

“The builder’s anxious to plow ahead and he will plow ahead with six bedrooms instead of eight if he has to,” said Davignon. But he won’t have to, because the board approved the septic variance for that size house.

Also during the meeting, the board continued the public hearing for a number of variance requests for 30 Rocky Knook Lane, represented by Brian Grady of G.A.F. Engineering.

Grady brought with him an updated plan reflecting a change from a two-bedroom house to a three-bedroom. Because of the change in the number of rooms on the plan, Walega advised the board that the hearing notice would have to be posted again to reflect the three bedrooms.

Grady agreed to re-advertising the public notice, but asked the board to give him feedback on the updated plan before moving forward.

Some of the variance requests pertain to relief from having to perform a perc test and allowing the soil test lab results to suffice, given that the water table at the property – and all along the street, according to Grady – is too high for a perc test. Grady also requested a variance from some of the setbacks including street setback and wetlands setback. The septic system street setbacks would be 7.5 feet instead of the required 10 feet, and the wetlands setbacks would be 44 feet instead of the required 50 feet.

“I’m trying to push the system as far away from the house as we can and keep it far away from the wetland,” said Grady.

Grady requested another variance for water table separation, asking for 4 feet of separation rather than the required 5 feet.

The system will be designed for a three-bedroom and, according to Marion’s code, requires a 400 gallon-per-day capacity. The proposed system is 348 gallons, which meets the state’s code of 330 gallons per day, but not the Town’s.

“But it doesn’t meet our code and it’s in a sensitive area,” said board member Betsy Dunn.

Grady said the system would have to be moved closer to the wetlands in order to meet Marion’s 400 gallons per day.

Board of Health member Jason Reynolds asked, “If it were designed for the four hundred gallons, how close would it end up to the wetlands?”

“Another four feet closer,” Grady said.

Reynolds said he would be fine with the setback variances, to which Dunn agreed.

“I think I would be okay with the second [variance], but I think I’d be more likely to vote for the wetland variance if it actually was … forty feet from the wetlands and have the four hundred gallon capacity than to be as is.”

Grady said he could make that change.

“I would agree with that,” said Board of Health Chairman John Howard.

The hearing was continued until March 13 to allow for the proper posting of the meeting notice.

The board also approved a variance for 33 Cove Road represented by Doug Schneider of N. Douglas Schneider & Associates, Inc.

The next meeting of the Marion Board of Health is scheduled for February 27 at 4:30 pm at the Marion Town House.

Marion Board of Health

By Jean Perry