Mattapoisett’s Community Preservation Act Committee met on December 13 to begin the vetting process for grant applications received for the FY23 budget cycle. Grants passing muster will then go on to the Spring Town Meeting to determine the will of the people.

            Five grants have been received, and preliminary discussion has begun to formulate questions to be answered by the applicants in advance of formal interviews and presentations to the committee.

            One grant request garnering the most discussion was for $150,000 received from the Mattapoisett/Massachusetts Housing Authority for property located off Main Street. The subsidized housing, which is owned by the state, was built some 40 years ago and is managed primarily by the state.

            The application is for the purchase and installation of new sliding-glass partitions along the front façade of the structure. “The locks don’t work so it’s a safety issue,” CPA Chairman Chuck McCullough stated.

            As chair of the Mattapoisett Housing Authority, McCullough intends to recuse himself when the grant application comes up for a vote. He went on to further explain that the old glass does not shield the interior from harmful sunlight, “If it’s 110 outside, it’s 110 inside.”

            McCullough then described the process for securing housing at this location. Units are not held aside for Mattapoisett residents, nor are residents more likely to be selected over someone applying from out of town. McCullough explained that the highest priority is given to homeless people, followed by veterans. Other criteria includes whether or not the applicant is disabled, either physically or mentally, and their age. However, he said that 10% of all units must be allocated to young, disabled applicants.

            McCullough shared that in the past, he had believed the town’s money should not be spent on state-owned property but not this time. “We will get three dollars for every one dollar we contribute to the project,” he said, meaning the state will pick up the balance of the retrofit estimated at $700,000.

            Other applications received include a request for $15,000 from the Mattapoisett Historical Commission for continued town survey of historical structures, a $38,000 request by the American Legion Hall for sanitary repairs and improvements and $47,648 from the Mattapoisett Historical Society, which owns the Mattapoisett Museum.

            Committee members questioned if the CPA should be funding maintenance projects and if the society has sought other funding sources such as their endowment. Similar questions regarding funding were raised regarding the American Legion Post. Committee member Karen Field wondered if they have sought funding through the National Association of American Veterans, Inc.

            A large request came from the Mattapoisett River Valley Water District in the amount of $85,000 for the purchase of more than 200 acres in cooperation with Rochester, Fairhaven and Marion. Questions as to whether the sale will rise or fail depending on all the member communities agreeing to pony up funding remained open, as did the question as to if all the towns will be expected to advance the same amount of money. The estimated price tag for the acreage is approximately $6,000,000.

            These questions and others will be sent ahead to the applicants before formal interviews take place in January.

            The next meeting of the Mattapoisett CPA Committee is scheduled for Thursday, December 29, at 5:30 pm.

Mattapoisett Community Preservation Act

By Marilou Newell

            The Rochester Board of Health on December 7 reviewed a draft letter that will request “slowing down” the implementation of proposed new and potentially expensive state septic-system installation regulations.

            Town Health Director Karen Walega said the Department of Environmental Protection is proposing to require nitrogen-reduction systems for even existing septic systems. This new regulation, she said, would require costly system upgrades or require the town to apply for a Watershed Area designation permit.

            The latter would give the town 20 years to see where the water-polluting nitrogen is coming from, she said. This complicated, equally expensive process would have to succeed at reducing the pollutant.

            Otherwise, even the elderly and homeowners on fixed incomes would have to pay up to $50,000 above their other septic-system costs for a new mechanical system including denitrification technology. And that does not include the electricity to run the new fan-based systems, roughly $70 to $80 per month.

            The new system has only gotten “provisional” approval from the DEP, Walega said. Yet the DEP is speeding through the new regulation’s approval process; the current implementation target date is January 3, 2023.

            The town, explained Walega, needs to request the state slow down with that process until more information can be gathered. “We need to all sit down with the DEP,” she said. “We need to slow this down and everyone have a seat at the table to discuss this.”

            Board of Health Chairman David Souza and the other members agreed to have a final draft of its letter to the state ready to be sent by early this week. “There are other systems like it that don’t cost as much and might work more efficiently,” Souza said. “We’ve got to slow them down.”

            Walega noted that while the south coast is being targeted in Phase One of the state’s plan, “This is a state-wide problem,” she said. A Conservation Law Foundation lawsuit regarding high nitrogen pollution in the state’s groundwater is a main reason for this action, she added. “But towns have been called to the table for their input. … Rochester has 2,900 homes. How will we finance that many homeowners? Financially, people just can’t do it.”

            “I’m all for protecting the environment,” Souza said. “But we have to use common sense.”

            Elsewhere on the December 7 agenda, the Board of Health approved a percolation-rate variance to allow the building of a home and farmstand at the 58.5-acre Elliot Farm on Marion Road.

            Souza said the soil there is in “beautiful” condition but will need a lot of fill because it is not too far from land that is wet. He and fellow board members said they were very much in favor of seeing this property developed as planned.

            Also, the board approved the $6,800 recycling/landfill contract with Tighe and Bond for next year.

            The next meeting of the Rochester Board of Health is scheduled for Wednesday, January 4, 2023, at 4:00 pm in the Town Hall Meeting Room, 1 Constitution Way, Rochester.

Rochester Board of Health

By Michael J. DeCicco

            The Rochester Zoning Board of Appeals opened a public hearing on December 8 into a plan to build an 80×204-foot steel building with 10 separate bays and 16,320 square feet of floor space at 19 Country Road. But the board could not even come close to rendering a decision.

            Neighbors who are so concerned about the scale of the plan that they hired an attorney, expressed objections that led the petitioners Robert and Christine Murphy to request a continuance to January 26.

            The Murphys said they were blindsided by their neighbors’ reaction and wanted more time to be better prepared, including contacting their own attorney. They said the neighbors seemed okay with their plan to build a garage when the couple first discussed it with them. “We had no idea they were upset with this plan,” Christine Murphy said.

            Robert Murphy started the hearing by noting the first of his two requests before the Zoning panel is for a special permit to rent this garage space to people who are already storing items on his large property. He would fill the other parts of the garage with his own equipment and his race cars so he could store them and work on them in the winter. His other request before the panel is a variance to run his trucking company with up to three employees there.

            Attorney Michael Kennefick, representing several of the abutters, countered that the proposed use does not belong where it is being planned. The site is in a residential-agricultural zone, and it is surrounded by neighbors. There is a junkyard that is an isolated, non-agricultural use in that area, but Murphy’s trucking company is an unlawful operation in that location, Kennefick asserted.

            To buttress his argument, Kennefick noted a use approved by the ZBA “must be in harmony with the intent of the town bylaw. The number of neighbors here proves this would not be in harmony.”

            Abutter Amy Bennett, 9 County Road, said she and her husband Kevin have a “medically delicate,” wheelchair-bound child. “I’m concerned about what this does to all our lives,” she said. “We have a brand-new deck. From it, we see wrecked vehicles and all the trucks. There’ll be more noise; more trucks will come and go. I never thought I’d be here to stop an industrial use in a residential area. And it will devalue our property. This is really too much.”

            Christine Murphy said she had thought she and her husband had a great relationship with the neighbors. She said they have helped them with their own projects. They are cleaning up their property that the neighbors see from their yards. The new building, she said, “is going to block looking at that junkyard.”

            Board Chairman Thomas Flynn encouraged the Murphys to talk to the neighbors as well as their lawyer before January 26.

            In other action, the Zoning panel approved a setback-requirement variance at 3 County Road to allow the building of a 20×16-foot deck closer than the required 40 feet from the side setback. Board members acknowledged in their motion that the size of the house lot and the location of the septic system would make it a hardship to place the deck elsewhere on the lot.

            The next meeting of the Rochester Zoning Board of Appeals is scheduled for Thursday, December 22, at 7:15 pm in the Town Hall meeting room, 1 Constitution Way, Rochester.

Rochester Zoning Board of Appeals

By Michael J. DeCicco

            Having seen the Town of Rochester push back on the state’s winter-2023 timeframe to implement a new regulation requiring septic owners in designated nitrogen-sensitive areas to install expensive denitrification systems, Mattapoisett Board of Health Chairman Carmelo Nicolosi was eager to follow suit when the board met on December 8.

            A debate is growing as to the source of the nitrogen that is polluting the harbors along the south coast and Cape Cod.

            The effort to arrive at reliable conclusions includes surveying for a Nitrogen Sensitive Watershed Study and discussions with the state Department of Environmental Protection about funding the work.

            According to Mattapoisett Land Trust President Mike Huguenin, the mouth of the Mattapoisett River is “very degraded.” A new map produced in 2021 indicates that 50 acres of eel grass has been lost to the mouth of the river and is now “mud flat” according to Huguenin, who recommended the board consult with Buzzards Bay expert Joe Costa.

            In answer to Nicolosi’s question as to any uniformity of results from water testing for nitrogen, Huguenin indicated that going back 20 to 30 years, nitrogen levels were higher in places such as Tub Mill Brook. While up-river nitrogen levels are now somewhat lower, the levels in the harbor itself are trending slightly upward. The data, said Huguenin, is subject to interpretation. “Depends on how you squint at it,” he said.

            While MassDEP is not backing off its timeline for implementation, certain things must happen first that could leverage delays. For instance, the Town of Fairhaven has yet to identify a nitrogen-sensitive area, a task that could delay implementation anywhere from 18 months to two years.

            Fairhaven, along with host Mattapoisett, Marion and to a lesser extent Rochester, is a member of the Mattapoisett River Valley Water District. When the state identifies nitrogen-sensitive areas, it will look at watershed districts.

            The monthly public meetings of the MRV’s Water Supply Protection Advisory Committee and District Commission were to be held on Tuesday.

            While the Environmental Protection Agency has yet to implement a total maximum daily load (TMDL), Nasketucket Bay State Reservation is expected to become the first Mattapoisett area targeted by the state’s septic plan, followed by Aucoot Cove and Mattapoisett Harbor. Any watershed that integrates towns, golf courses and sewerage will be evaluated.

            Bob Field of Field Engineering has been hired by the town to conduct testing and mapping to determine Mattapoisett’s major nitrogen sources, be it farms, septic systems or birds. To finance the research and field work, the town will try to secure some grant funding.

            In other business, the board approved two applications for projects on residential properties. The board granted a variance to allow a 3.6-foot separation from the groundwater table to the base of the septic system at 108 Acushnet Road and approved the relocation of a septic system to the rear of a house on Randall Road.

            The board also discussed a lack of adequate feedback regarding a potential, regional recycling center at the town’s transfer station off Tinkham Hill Road.

            Earlier this year, a private company visited the transfer station to propose the center it would finance and build, inviting residents in surrounding municipalities to participate. The host town holds the first right of refusal in processing food waste up to the capacity allowed at the site.

            State mandates are on the horizon that would require shipping food waste out of town, a costly exercise and one that local taxpayers would not be able to control.

            Finally, the board approved Health Agent Gail Joseph’s proposed policy on the use of its truck, along with associated expenses and reimbursements.

            The next public meeting of the Mattapoisett Board of Health was not set upon adjournment.

Mattapoisett Board of Health

By Mick Colageo

The December 12 meeting of the Mattapoisett Conservation Commission was one of those rare occasions when a municipal board gets to hear from the youth in the community. Coming before the commission on this night was Boy Scout Murray Copps to discuss his Eagle project.

            Copps has secured permission from various private-property owners, whose holdings include marshlands, to install bird boxes for Tree Swallows.

            Marshy areas are the species’ preferred nesting site. Copps said that the birds feed on mosquitos, which carry Eastern Equine Encephalitis (“Triple E.”) He went on to say that Tree Swallows are a bird species “in decline,” his point being that the establishment of nesting boxes not only helps the birds but us as well.

            Conservation Commission Chairman Mike King called it a great project and good idea, while noting that the commission appreciated learning about the project but that permissions were not necessary, as long as the property owners gave permission. “This falls under wildlife enhancement,” he pointed out.

            Copps said the plan is to install approximately 12 boxes 40 feet apart while standing 5 feet above the marshes. He said the project will be completed by mid-January.

            In other business, a Notice of Intent filed by McGrath Realty Trust, 0 Cove Street, for the construction of a gravel parking area was continued until January 9. Bob Field of Field Engineering, representing the McGraths, was asked to submit a formalized plan that included the removal of boulders and a remediation planting plan.

            Three certificates of compliance were issued to Armand Cortellesso, Brandt Point Road Builders LLC. Cortellesso will receive the signed releases after confirmation by the commission’s agent that site clean-up and proper positioning of wetlands signage has taken place.

            An After the Fact Request for Determination of Applicability filed by John Romanelli, 15 Howard Beach, received a negative determination.

            The next meeting of the Mattapoisett Conservation Commission is scheduled for Monday, January 9, at 6:30 pm.

Mattapoisett Conservation Commission

By Marilou Newell