Thoughts on: Costs and Effect

To the Editor:

Thoughts on: Costs and Effect. I thought when I retired as an artist and educator I would be able to ignore all the voices spouting insincere and pretentious talk surrounding the importance of the arts in education who then would inevitably support the weakening or dismantling of art programs in our schools. Alas, my blood boils anew.

The Old Rochester Regional School Committee recently approved next year’s budget with a $616,000 increase over the current budget. Naturally as seems to have become the norm, despite the increase, new and existing important positions were cut including a guidance counselor, a special education director and, of course, an art teacher.

I understand the difficulty in building a school budget. Having served for many years as a Vice Chair of a School Committee elsewhere and as a former board member of both the Department of Education’s Arts Advisory Council and the Massachusetts Alliance for Arts Education, I appreciate that providing for the general operation of a multi-million dollar publically-funded enterprise with its maintenance costs, salary obligations, insurance increases, state mandates and all the rest is difficult. I, too, once had to vote to cut an art teacher, and I lost my first teaching position in a reduction in force. I get it.

Still, I wonder where I would be had I not been able to study art at Old Rochester. According to the school principal, the reduction of that art position will leave the school with one art teacher and will deprive 218 students … nearly a third of the school’s total population … who want to take art from doing so. I wonder how many of those students plan on pursuing art as a career as I did. With the help of my teachers, I was able to prepare a quality portfolio that got me accepted into two prestigious art colleges.

For over fifty years, I made my living from art. I know that studying art is a viable avenue to success in our complex world, not just an expendable luxury. After all, art is everywhere and has been long before the French scientist Blaise Pascal invented the first calculating machine in 1642. Not to suggest that a scientific- or technology-based career is not desirable, but without artists much of what we see and use today would not exist. Talented artists who have chosen careers in a wide variety of creative disciplines serve our culture and society and contribute billions of dollars to our economy.

Consider that the eyeglasses through which you are reading this were likely designed by an artist who chose a career as an industrial designer. He or she may even have designed the machine that ground the lenses ensuring that it not only functioned and was safe for the operator but looked attractive as well.

The design and layout of this paper was created by a layout artist. In fact, the type style you are reading was created a long, long time ago by an artist to be easily read. The blouse, skirt or slacks you are wearing, your shoes and yes, even your undergarments were created by artists working as clothing designers. The rings on your fingers, your wallet or purse and even the money in them plus the chair you sit on, your cell phone and everything on your desk including the desk and just about everything in your home, all had an artist’s hand in its design. Even your house was designed by an architect trained in art in order to understand design principles and express their ideas to their clients. And, I haven’t even mentioned all the art on TV and in the movies that entertain us or in museums that record our history and define our culture. All of these professionals studied art first, probably in high school.

The good news is that some people are trying to raise awareness of arts education funding issues, even in Washington. A newly-created Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) has the potential to improve the standing of art education in classrooms across the nation. In Massachusetts, the Arts/Learning and MASSCreative organizations have begun initiatives to improve and foster arts education policy that support students who are under served.

While these efforts are commendable, not until the local education communities change their perception of art as a pleasant diversion and recognize the potential in young students who show the desire to pursue art studies will students like those 218 at Old Rochester be served. The communities I know that cut their art programs have reconsidered and redoubled their commitment. All now have flourishing programs that service all of their students.

Dick Morgado, Mattapoisett

 

The views expressed in the “Letters to the Editor” column are not necessarily those of The Wanderer, its staff or advertisers. The Wanderer will gladly accept any and all correspondence relating to timely and pertinent issues in the great Marion, Mattapoisett and Rochester area, provided they include the author’s name, address and phone number for verification. We cannot publish anonymous, unsigned or unconfirmed submissions. The Wanderer reserves the right to edit, condense and otherwise alter submissions for purposes of clarity and/or spacing considerations. The Wanderer may choose to not run letters that thank businesses, and The Wanderer has the right to edit letters to omit business names. The Wanderer also reserves the right to deny publication of any submitted correspondence.

Leave A Comment...

*